1964 Holden EK vs. 2002 Mazda 2
To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 2 (78 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EK (160 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (124 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2002 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | EK | 2 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 78 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
