1964 Holden EK vs. 2002 Proton 300
To start off, 2002 Proton 300 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Proton 300 (75 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1964 Holden EK. (65 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Proton 300 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EK (160 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton 300. (108 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EK | 2002 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Holden | Proton |
| Model | EK | 300 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 65 HP | 75 HP |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1710 mm |
