1964 MG 1100 vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford C-Max (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford C-Max weights approximately 550 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford C-Max (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1964 MG 1100 | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
Make | MG | Ford |
Model | 1100 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2648 mm |