1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Charger weights approximately 816 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Nissan | Dodge |
Model | Bluebird | Charger |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1188 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 5083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3048 mm |