1964 Seat 1500 vs. 2010 Dodge Caliber
To start off, 2010 Dodge Caliber is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Caliber is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Caliber (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Caliber should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Caliber weights approximately 174 kg more than 1964 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Caliber, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Seat 1500 | 2010 Dodge Caliber | |
Make | Seat | Dodge |
Model | 1500 | Caliber |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1334 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4415 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1534 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2634 mm |