1964 Zastava 1500 vs. 2013 Ford Focus

To start off, 2013 Ford Focus is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Focus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Focus (158 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 1500. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Focus should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Focus weights approximately 337 kg more than 1964 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Focus (198 Nm @ 4450 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Focus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Zastava 1500.

Compare all specifications: