1965 Abarth 1300 vs. 1962 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1965 Abarth 1300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Abarth 1300 (137 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Reliant Sabre Six weights approximately 186 kg more than 1965 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Abarth 1300 | 1962 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Abarth | Reliant |
Model | 1300 | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 1965 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 816 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 38 L |