1965 Austin A 60 vs. 1999 Citroen XM
To start off, 1999 Citroen XM is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Citroen XM (115 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Citroen XM weights approximately 160 kg more than 1965 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Citroen XM (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 60 | 1999 Citroen XM | |
Make | Austin | Citroen |
Model | A 60 | XM |
Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1621 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 115 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 66 L |