1965 Austin A 90 vs. 2012 Honda Civic
To start off, 2012 Honda Civic is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Austin A 90 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2012 Honda Civic. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Civic.
Because 1965 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda Civic. (127 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1965 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin A 90 | 2012 Honda Civic | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | A 90 | Civic |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 1339 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1785 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1460 mm |