1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2008 Peugeot 307

To start off, 2008 Peugeot 307 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 864 kg more than 2008 Peugeot 307.

Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Peugeot 307, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Cadillac Sixty 2008 Peugeot 307
Make Cadillac Peugeot
Model Sixty 307
Year Released 1965 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7029 cc 1587 cc
Horse Power 208 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2115 kg 1251 kg
Vehicle Length 5790 mm 3740 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 3390 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 L 60 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]