1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 669 kg more than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | Sixty | Condor |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1446 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 70 L |
