1965 Citroen 2CV vs. 1986 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1986 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,041 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Volkswagen Polo (44 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 210 kg more than 1965 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen 2CV | 1986 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Citroen | Volkswagen |
Model | 2CV | Polo |
Year Released | 1965 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 1041 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2340 mm |