1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1965 DAF Daffodil is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus Elan (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DAF Daffodil weights approximately 66 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
Make | DAF | Lotus |
Model | Daffodil | Elan |
Year Released | 1965 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 45 L |