1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2008 Land Rover Discovery
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,950 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Discovery is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Discovery weights approximately 1515 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil.
Because 2008 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 2008 Land Rover Discovery | |
Make | DAF | Land Rover |
Model | Daffodil | Discovery |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 93 L |