1965 DKW Munga vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 980 cc (3 cylinders), 1965 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru R2 (52 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DKW Munga weights approximately 330 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Subaru R2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | DKW | Subaru |
| Model | Munga | R2 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 30 L |
