1965 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban (320 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 277 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1433 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chevrolet Suburban. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 2010 Chevrolet Suburban | |
| Make | DKW | Chevrolet |
| Model | Munga | Suburban |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2543 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5649 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1951 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3302 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 117 L |
