1965 Ford Mustang vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 1989 Mazda 323 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 131 kg more than 1989 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Ford Mustang | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Mustang | 323 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4261 cc | 1324 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2620 mm |
