1965 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Xedos 9
To start off, 2004 Xedos 9 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2004 Xedos 9. (161 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Xedos 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Xedos 9 weights approximately 469 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Ford Mustang | 2004 Xedos 9 | |
Make | Ford | Xedos |
Model | Mustang | 9 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2760 mm |