1965 Holden EH vs. 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Holden EH weights approximately 195 kg more than 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1965 Holden EH has automatic transmission and 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste has manual transmission. 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Holden EH will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Holden EH | 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | EH | Celeste |
Year Released | 1965 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2350 mm |