1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 1973 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1496 kg more than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lincoln Continental | 1973 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Lincoln | Mitsubishi |
Model | Continental | Colt |
Year Released | 1965 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7048 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2360 mm |