1965 Lincoln Continental vs. 1999 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1999 Chevrolet Blazer. (196 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1999 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 561 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Lincoln Continental | 1999 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | Lincoln | Chevrolet |
Model | Continental | Blazer |
Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7048 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 196 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2406 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1710 mm |