1965 Morgan 4 vs. 1992 Rover 216
To start off, 1992 Rover 216 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Rover 216 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Rover 216 (122 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1965 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Rover 216 should accelerate faster than 1965 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Rover 216 weights approximately 430 kg more than 1965 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 216, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Morgan 4 | 1992 Rover 216 | |
| Make | Morgan | Rover |
| Model | 4 | 216 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1340 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2560 mm |
