1965 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 500 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Oldsmobile |
Model | Starfire | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1965 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6965 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2680 mm |