1966 Abarth 1300 vs. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne
To start off, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (110 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne weights approximately 1177 kg more than 1966 Abarth 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Abarth 1300 | 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 1300 | Biscayne |
Year Released | 1966 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 4097 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1807 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 3090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 87 L |