1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1969 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1969 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Brougham (228 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1635 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 1969 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
Model | A 110 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1966 | 1969 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 228 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 79 L |