1966 Audi Variant vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Audi Variant would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1966 Audi Variant. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1966 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 496 kg more than 1966 Audi Variant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Audi Variant. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Audi Variant | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | Variant | BLS |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 265 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1566 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2680 mm |
