1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2000 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2000 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Land Rover |
| Model | Sprite | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2750 mm |
