1966 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2008 Ford E-350
To start off, 2008 Ford E-350 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite weights approximately 103 kg more than 2008 Ford E-350.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2008 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
Model | Sprite | E-350 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Body Type | Roadster | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 5409 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 255 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1077 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 6030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 132 L |