1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 15 kg more than 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Sixty | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 109 L |
