1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1999 Subaru Outback
To start off, 1999 Subaru Outback is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1999 Subaru Outback. (154 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1999 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 625 kg more than 1999 Subaru Outback. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1999 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
| Model | Sixty | Outback |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2457 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1490 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 64 L |
