1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2001 Toyota BB
To start off, 2001 Toyota BB is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2001 Toyota BB. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota BB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1095 kg more than 2001 Toyota BB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota BB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 2001 Toyota BB | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Sixty | BB |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 45 L |