1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2008 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1051 kg more than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Because 1966 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac Sixty | 2008 Mazda Etude | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Sixty | Etude |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1597 cc |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1064 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 55 L |
