1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (305 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 279 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 644 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2000 Opel Omega | |
| Make | DAF | Opel |
| Model | Daffodil | Omega |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 5666 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1310 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 52 L |
