1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2007 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2007 Subaru Outback is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Subaru Outback (175 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Subaru Outback weights approximately 894 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2007 Subaru Outback | |
Make | DAF | Subaru |
Model | Daffodil | Outback |
Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 64 L |