1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2011 Dacia Sandero
To start off, 2011 Dacia Sandero is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Dacia Sandero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Dacia Sandero (74 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Dacia Sandero should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Dacia Sandero weights approximately 445 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Dacia Sandero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2011 Dacia Sandero | |
| Make | DAF | Dacia |
| Model | Daffodil | Sandero |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1111 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 50 L |
