1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2011 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2011 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Peugeot RCZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot RCZ (197 HP) has 171 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2011 Peugeot RCZ | |
| Make | DAF | Peugeot |
| Model | Daffodil | RCZ |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4287 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1359 mm |
