1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1966 Ford GT 40 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 297 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 236 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford GT 40 | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | GT 40 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1966 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2290 mm |