1966 Ford GT 40 vs. 1985 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1985 Lincoln Continental is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1985 Lincoln Continental. (138 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1985 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 564 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Lincoln Continental (338 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1985 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ford GT 40 | 1985 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | GT 40 | Continental |
Year Released | 1966 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 338 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2760 mm |