1966 Holden EH vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Fluence (110 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Fluence weights approximately 40 kg more than 1966 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | EH | Fluence |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 110 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4618 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1809 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2702 mm |