1966 Holden EH vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 266 kg more than 1966 Holden EH.
Because 1966 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1966 Holden EH has automatic transmission and 2010 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2010 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1966 Holden EH will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden EH | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | EH | C30 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2639 mm |