1966 Holden HD vs. 2000 TVR Speed 12
To start off, 2000 TVR Speed 12 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 7,730 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 TVR Speed 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 TVR Speed 12 (790 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 668 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 TVR Speed 12 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 200 kg more than 2000 TVR Speed 12.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 TVR Speed 12 (881 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 644 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 TVR Speed 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Holden HD | 2000 TVR Speed 12 | |
Make | Holden | TVR |
Model | HD | Speed 12 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2930 cc | 7730 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 790 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7750 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 881 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2570 mm |