1966 Holden HD vs. 2012 Holden Barina
To start off, 2012 Holden Barina is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden HD (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Barina. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1966 Holden HD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Holden HD | 2012 Holden Barina | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | HD | Barina |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2930 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 197 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1650 mm |
