1966 Marcos 1500 vs. 1995 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1995 Mercury Villager is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Marcos 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Marcos 1500 would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1966 Marcos 1500. (85 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1966 Marcos 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercury Villager weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1966 Marcos 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Marcos 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Marcos 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Marcos 1500 | 1995 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | Marcos | Mercury |
| Model | 1500 | Villager |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2860 mm |
