1966 Nissan Cedric vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Nissan Cedric (114 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 155 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Nissan Cedric | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Nissan | Proton |
Model | Cedric | 400 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |