1966 Nissan Cedric vs. 2003 Rover 75
To start off, 2003 Rover 75 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Rover 75 (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Rover 75 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1966 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Rover 75. (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Nissan Cedric | 2003 Rover 75 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | Cedric | 75 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |