1966 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Mazda 2
To start off, 2013 Mazda 2 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 247 kg more than 2013 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Nissan | Mazda |
| Model | Cedric | 2 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1694 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1476 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2489 mm |
