1966 Riley Kestrel vs. 2012 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC70 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 995 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2012 Volvo XC70 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Riley Kestrel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC70 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Riley Kestrel | 2012 Volvo XC70 | |
| Make | Riley | Volvo |
| Model | Kestrel | XC70 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4838 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1862 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1604 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2815 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 70 L |
