1966 Seat 1500 vs. 2009 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2009 Subaru Forester is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,456 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Forester (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Subaru Forester weights approximately 275 kg more than 1966 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Seat 1500 | 2009 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Seat | Subaru |
| Model | 1500 | Forester |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1481 cc | 2456 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2620 mm |
