1966 Seat 1500 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 581 kg more than 1966 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Seat 1500 | 2010 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Seat | Chevrolet |
Model | 1500 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1741 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2858 mm |