1966 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 1999 Tata Indica
To start off, 1999 Tata Indica is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1999 Tata Indica. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1999 Tata Indica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 204 kg more than 1999 Tata Indica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Tata Indica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | 1999 Tata Indica | |
| Make | Sunbeam | Tata |
| Model | Tiger | Indica |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Size | 4259 cc | 1405 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 936 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2410 mm |
